Rjack wrote:
The GPL attempts in sec. 2(b) to regulate the distribution of derivative works "in rem" with a contract -- which is equivalent to formulating a new copyright law under state common law.
Oh, good lord. So that's what you've been getting on about. What a magnificent piece of crankitude. OK, I finally understand. You're wrong, of course, but at least now I see why you keep pointing at preemption as if it means something. I anxiously await the sober judge who will see things your way. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
