Doug Mentohl wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > > Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > >> If what you wrote is true, then it is surprising that companies like IBM, > > > From IBM's FAQ regarding open source: > > > "There are very few cases where distribution of third party GPL/LGPL code > > is appropriate; thus, most cases will NOT be approved. Discuss any proposed > > plan with your business executive and local legal EARLY. Look for > > alternatives to distribution of third party GPL/LGPL code." > > Do you have a link to that article, the only related one I can find is
It's on IBM's w3 WikiCentral. Ask Rex Ballard for the details. regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
