amicus_curious wrote:
That's assuming Tom-Tom are found guilty. The code would be available on the
server. All MS has to do is point it out. As such and in a court of law, it is
up to the plaintiff to prove the case not the other way round.
Yes. I said "if Tom-Tom were found to be infringing...". Could they avoid
paying by getting all their customers to download new, non-infringing firmware? NO is
the answer.
No one can be sued for distributing 'non-infringing firmware', your
statement is legalistic nonsense ..
--
'Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before
breakfast'
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
