"Doug Mentohl" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
'If Tom Tom or any other company cross licenses patents then by section 7
of GPLv2 (for the Linux kernel) they lose the rights to redistribute the
kernel at all ..'
Who do you think would sue TomTom on this issue? It could not be busybox,
the FAT patents do not apply to their software and so they have no voice in
the matter. It seems to me it would have to be someone claiming to be the
copyright owner for Linux. Who is that?
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
