Doug Mentohl <[email protected]> writes: > "The GPL is unenforceable under U.S. copyright law", Rjack > > Produce any citation where a recipient of GPL code successfully fought > and won such a case.
Why would you angle for a Pyrrhic victory? "Ok, you don't accept the GPL and it can't be enforced." Perfectly reasonable and quite plausible. "So the GPL is not the topic of our case. What was it again that made you think you were entitled to redistribution of the software?" Of course no defendant has an interest in a court decision _against_ the GPL on its merits, because the merits are _for_ the defendant. So if neither plaintiff nor defendant are interested in a decision against the GPL, the court will never get to a verdict relevant for the GPL. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
