Rjack wrote:
FORGET THE CAFC'S ARTISTIC LICENSE DECISION IT HAS NO BINDING PRECEDENTIAL VALUE *ANTWHERE* IN ANY U.S. COURT.
Your mistake is that you believe that we refer to the CAFC decision because it is binding. We refer to the CAFC decision because we believe that courts which find themselves in a similar situation will apply similar reasoning and reach similar conclusions. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
