Rjack wrote: > Hyman Rosen wrote: >> It is up to the rights holders to decide whether they are satisfied >> with how they are being treated. > There weeeeeeeeeeeeent the goalposts.
Do you believe that it is not up to the rights holders to decide whether they are satisfied? >> In this case, they appear to have >> decided that since owners of these routers are free to run, read, >> modify, and share the code it comes with, they are satisfied with >> the outcome and do not need to pursue the matter further. > > Confucius say, "Appearances deceive". Do you believe the rights holders are not satisfied? On what evidence? _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
