Jack Shit wrote: > Hyman Rosen wrote: >> Rjack wrote: >>> 17 USC 103(b) means that a derivative work may be distributed as >> > a "whole" only by contractual agreement of both copyright holders >> > in "privity". That means that the right to distribute the derivative >> > work is a personal "in personam" right created by contract. >> >> What nonsense. What you may do with a copyrighted work depends on the >> license granted by the copyright holder, if such a license exists. No >> personal contract is required. >> >> Even if you were correct (which you are not), 17 USC 103 is irrelevant >> to your claim, saying only that the creator of a compiled or derivative >> work does not gain copyright in the source material and that the >> presence of the work in a compilation or derived work does not affect >> the term of the copyright of the source material. This has nothing at >> all to do with distribution under the GPL. > > Congratulations Hymen! You has have moooooooooooooooooooved into > total denial. Few people reach that level of denial. For most > people, some small element of reality manages to reach them. Not you > though. >
Translation: You can't counter anything he wrote -- We are Linux. Resistance is measured in Ohms. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
