"ml2mst" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > Roy Schestowitz wrote: >> ____/ Doug Mentohl on Tuesday 17 March 2009 18:49 : \____ >> >>> 'the purpose of this portfolio is defensive .. because of the threats >>> of >>> companies that are hostile to FOSS and that have amassed large >>> stockpiles of overbroad patents' >> >>> 'Although there have been some recent questions about one of our patent >>> applications relating to the AMQP specification, they appear to >>> originate in an attempt to spread FUD. Theres no reasonable, objective >>> basis for controversy' >> >>> http://www.press.redhat.com/2009/03/17/discouraging-software-patent-lawsuits/ >> >> It's not really FUD. >> >> The former head of the FFII is sure to publicise information which >> suggests >> that Red Hat is not or was not serious about ending software patents. >> People >> should not let them off the hook so easily. >
> What I recently learned from BN and ..... Absolutely ridiculous. If you really want to *LEARN* something about Redhat and patents in general why waste your time reading a garbage site like BN? Anyone with any brains would find accurate unbiased information from a site that's more interested in actual facts then a crap site like BN that's primarily interested in a twisted political agenda. So you get your "knowledge and facts" from BN.... that says more about you than you know. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
