Thufir Hawat wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:26:59 -0400, Rjack wrote:
In the current suit Free Software Foundation Inc. v. Cisco
Systems Inc. the FSF is asking for monetary damages:
which is commercial, so the comparison fails there.
Read the Grokfud link:
[ Update: Ray Beckerman sends a correction. He says the
reasoning of the four cases and two law review articles and the
brief is equally applicable to commercial copyright
infringement defendants.]"
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20090321164736122
Sincerely, Rjack
" So it's more support for the concept of proportionality and
asking the court to consider the Constitutionality of statutory
damages in copyright cases involving noncommercial individuals."
-from the above link.
*cases involving noncommercial individuals*. Is cisco such an
individual?
"[ Update: Ray Beckerman sends a correction. He says the reasoning
of the four cases and two law review articles and the brief is
equally applicable to commercial copyright infringement defendants.]"
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20090321164736122
Hmmm. . . I see, ". . . equally applicable to commercial copyright
infringement defendants."
Why not write PJ and ask her to remove the "Update:" from her
article since you wish to ignore it?
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
