Alan Mackenzie <[email protected]> writes, following up to Rjack: >How can there be a contract when there's been no agreement between the >parties involved?....
Rjack already lost this argument under a different subject heading. Each time he loses an argument he reposts it under a new subject heading. See the previous subject heading "Tom Tom and Microsofts Linux patent lock-down ..". Rjack found cases where the court used contract law to determine a remedy for a license violation. Seeing the word "contract", he came to the erroneous conclusion that, just because you can base a remedy on contract law, therefore there is no difference between a license and a contract. And therefore, you no longer need an offer an an acceptance to form a contract. So now, let me predict: We will soon see Rjack repost the same flawed argument under yet another subject heading. -- Rahul http://rahul.rahul.net/ _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
