On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:09:32 -0400, Rjack wrote: >>> IF A COPYRIGHT LICENSE EXISTS, ITS LANGUAGE WILL BE INTERPRETED AS A >>> CONTRACT IN DETERMINING ITS COVENANTS FOR PURPOSES OF BREACH AND THEN >>> EXAMINED FOR LANGUAGE DETERMINING SCOPE FOR PURPOSES OF INFRINGEMENT. >> >> >> Assuming this is so, what's your point? > > The point of an original newsgroup post seems to evolvs with the number > of posts to the thread. I think we were discussing legal enforcement of > the GPL.
If EULA are contracts, what makes the GPL different from other EULA, in your view? -Thufir _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
