Thufir Hawat wrote:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:09:32 -0400, Rjack wrote:
IF A COPYRIGHT LICENSE EXISTS, ITS LANGUAGE WILL BE
INTERPRETED AS A CONTRACT IN DETERMINING ITS COVENANTS FOR
PURPOSES OF BREACH AND THEN EXAMINED FOR LANGUAGE
DETERMINING SCOPE FOR PURPOSES OF INFRINGEMENT.
Assuming this is so, what's your point?
The point of an original newsgroup post seems to evolvs with
the number of posts to the thread. I think we were discussing
legal enforcement of the GPL.
If EULA are contracts, what makes the GPL different from other
EULA, in your view?
The GPL contains unenforceable terms.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
