Hyman Rosen wrote:
Rjack wrote:The CAFC case is meaningless to *any* other copyright infringement case *anywhere*:The reasoning it applied was straightforward and correct and will be applied when similar cases arise elsewhere.
Fact: The CAFC case is meaningless to *any* other copyright infringement case *anywhere*: _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
