Hyman Rosen wrote: [...] > against public policy. A license which acts to make a work > more widely available is the opposite of that.
You're utterly confused regarding the GPL vs. http://opensource.org/licenses/fair.php http://opensource.org/licenses/isc-license.txt http://opensource.org/licenses/bsl1.0.html and (for example) http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode or some such. I bet that "fellow crank" Daniel Wallace would not file a complaint against those. Do you have any doubts, Hyman? Please explain why. regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
