Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote: [...]
That's why the GPL carefully spells out all the requirements
which must be followed in order for permission to copy and
distribute to be granted, so that no one can argue that the
rights holders have given any other permission.
Thank God Hyman finally admitted there are "rights holders" --
that's *PLURAL* (see the 's' in 'holders'?) as in "bilateral
parties". Maybe there's hope for Hyman after all.
Stop being utter idiot Hyman.
Given, in the context of the GPL:
(a) permissions (b) requirements
Question:
How can one possibly fulfill (b) without first taking advantage
of (a)?
Your answer:
...
regards, alexander.
-- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive
derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as
GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU
cannot.)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
