On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:20:08 -0400, Rjack wrote: > Thufir Hawat wrote: >> On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 07:44:43 -0400, Rjack wrote: >> >>> The Free Software Foundation has *never* advanced a legal argument to >>> refute the fact that the GPL is contractually unenforceable and >>> preempted by the Copyright Act. >> >> >> What's your argument that isn't enforceable? > > The GPL is unequivocally a contract under U.S. law. (More specifically > it is a contract for a "grant of permission" or license.)
It's just as much a contract as any other EULA. -Thufir _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
