Thufir Hawat wrote:
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:20:08 -0400, Rjack wrote:
Thufir Hawat wrote:
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 07:44:43 -0400, Rjack wrote:
The Free Software Foundation has *never* advanced a legal argument to
refute the fact that the GPL is contractually unenforceable and
preempted by the Copyright Act.
What's your argument that isn't enforceable?
The GPL is unequivocally a contract under U.S. law. (More specifically
it is a contract for a "grant of permission" or license.)
It's just as much a contract as any other EULA.
-Thufir
So?
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
