On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:19:04 -0500, DFS wrote: > Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> DumbFullShit blubbered: >> >>> Alan Mackenzie wrote: >>>> In gnu.misc.discuss Doctor Smith <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:45:12 +0000 (UTC), Alan Mackenzie wrote: >>>> >>>>>> It seems Matt has long misunderstood the GPL. >>>> >>>>> Like 99 percent of people who through some unfortunate process come >>>>> in contact with it. >>>> >>>> I wouldn't know, since I don't know any such people. I know lots of >>>> people whose contact with the GPL is benign, rewarding and >>>> profitable. >>> >>> GPL and profitable in the same sentence? You funny guy! >> >> Most software is written and used "in-house", not for some "markt". > > It's very specious of you to sarcastically refer to "market" with quotes, > seeing as you make a living developing Windows programs for sale (or in > support of) a market. > > > >> Perfectly fine for GPL, as the software is not intended to be >> distributed outside of those companies. > > What does this mean? Where's your evidence corporations are developing GPL > code internally? You have none - you're a cola idiot. > > > >> You as the drooling VB-"coder" would know nothing about that, >> naturally. > > You sound mad that you're trapped in a Windows development career. Not > enough Linux jobs? But various cola liars claim Linux is on half the > desktops in Europe, so there should be a job for a dumbkopf like you.
I have a sneaking suspecian that Peter Kohlmann is involved in the abortion known as "The Munich Linux Migration". That would explain why he is so bitter. How much worse of a Linux failure can you find? Maybe some of Terry Porter's projects, but that's really about it. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
