On 2009-05-06, Doctor Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 06 May 2009 09:53:04 +0200, Hadron wrote:
>
>> Tim Smith <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>>> In article <[email protected]>,
>>> Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Tim Smith belched out
>>>> this bit o' wisdom:
>>>>
>>>> > In article <[email protected]>,
>>>> > Chris Ahlstrom <[email protected]> wrote:
[deletia]
>>> A corner case is (from Wikipedia):
>>>
>>> A corner case (or pathological case) is a problem or situation that
>>> occurs only outside of normal operating parameters â¹ specifically
>>> one that manifests itself when multiple environmental variables or
>>> conditions are simultaneously at extreme levels, even though each
>>> parameter is within the specified range for that parameter.
>>>
>>> If the "main meanings" of the GPL are so clear, how come so many people
>>> keep hitting these corner cases? Corner cases are supposed to be rare
>>> and hard to hit--not commonly run into like they are with GPL.
>>
>> As usual Arestrom comes out of a thread looking like a total idiot. His
>> willingness to look like a clueless dick in the "advocate" cause is
>> nothing short of amazing.
>
> It's creepy.
>
>
>> The key here was that "NO, the GPL is NOT easily understood by everyone
>> and anyone that thinks it is is living in dream land".
>
> Like I said before, just the fact that these GPL threads go on for days and
> across multiple groups, shows that the GPL is not understood.
...as if "dispute" ever proved anything about a legal matter.
All it demonstrates is that there are plenty of people that view
it in their interest to violate the GPL or undermine it in some way.
[deletia]
--
NO! There are no CODICILES of Fight Club! |||
/ | \
That way leads to lawyers and business megacorps and credit cards!
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
