Alan Mackenzie wrote:
In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack <u...@example.net> wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
At the same time, it's a legitimate question to put to Hadron
and you why you spend so much energy posting here, and whether
you're doing so on behalf of an organisation hostile to free
software. Care to answer these questions?
Why is it a "legitimate" question? Does copyright law change if
organizations are "hostile" to "free" software? If I were really
a Microsoft lawyer it wouldn't change copyright law one iota.
If you were known to be a lawyer, people would lend far more
credence to what you write about legal matters, and the discussions
would procede more smoothly.
Huh?
According to a 2004 Gallup poll all of 18% of Americans rated
lawyers' honesty and ethical standards as "very high" or "high".
If I were a lawyer, the last thing I would do is admit it.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/12/08/health/webmd/main659857.shtml
Sincerely,
Rjack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
