In article <[email protected]>, Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> wrote: >Alexander Terekhov wrote: >> Neither static linking nor dynamic linking triggers the GPL infection. > >You are wrong with respect to static linking, but that's not >something I expect you to acknowledge.
You are wrong. The important parts of the GPL have been written in Autumn 1987 and not changed significantly since then. As at that time there was no dynamic linking, the GPL has been made open with respect to _any_ independent library. -- EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [email protected] (uni) [email protected] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
