Hyman Rosen wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > > > Hyman Rosen wrote: > >> Alexander Terekhov wrote: > >>> And to the best of your belief, below is a clear copyright infringement, > >>> right Hyman? > >>> > >>> TAH TRARENY CHOYVP YVPRAFR > >>> Irefvba 3, 29 Whar 2007 > >> Seems to be. > > > > Why? > > It appears to be the result of taking the text of GPLv2 and > transforming it into a translated or pseudo-translated form. > That makes it a derivative work, and rights to make, copy, > and distribute derivative works are exclusive to the author.
Hyman, Hyman, I've just pushed the http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt into http://www.joeswebtools.com/security/rot13-encoder-decoder/ and you say that the result is a "derivative work"?! Who is the author of that "derivative work" and what are the creative elements attributed to the supposed author of that "derivative work"? regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
