Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Morning, Rjack!
In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack <[email protected]> wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
pretend that your copyright license to someone is
"automatically" terminated on the slightest breach of
obligations resulting from the permission
Copyright law grants the holder exclusive and fine-grained
rights to control making and distributing copies, and those
rights include providing conditions upon which granted
permissions may be withdrawn.
Please provide those Copyright law sections that grant those
"withdrawal" rights.
What Hyman said is common knowledge. Anybody who's worked in the
computer industry knows it. Why should he or anybody else go
through the tedium of showing what everybody knows? It's a bit
like somebody saying "2 + 2 = 4", and you piping up saying "prove
it!".
Yep. Just like WMD's in Iraq. Everyone knew they existed. Just common
knowledge. Yep.
If it doesn't exist, just make it up. Then when you can't back your
assertion, just dismiss your antagonist with empty rhetoric. Yep.
I think they're in your fertile imagination.
That's pure boorishness, not even attaining the sophistication
level of puerile playground taunts.
If you can't stand the bully then get off the playground.
Sincerely,
Rjack
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
