Hyman Rosen writes: > There is no need for a signed license in the absence of a conflicting > transfer.
It is not at all clear that the GPL is not a signed license in the broad sense in which judges often interpret "signed". "Signed written document" does not necessarily mean a quill pen scratching on parchment. It merely implies an individual's explicit agreement to a set of terms recorded in a permanent medium. -- John Hasler [email protected] Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
