Rjack wrote:
Which all sounds just like the GPL is indeed a contract
Sure. It seems to fit the definition of a unilateral contract. So? When a store offers to send you some money after you buy a certain item, they do not say they are offering you a unilateral contract. They say they are offering you a rebate. When a store offers to buy back an item you purchase if you do not like it, they do not say they are offering you a unilateral contract. They say they are offering you a money-back guarantee. Software universally comes with license agreements, so the GPL is a license. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
