Rjack wrote:
the plaintiffs have admitteded defeat by filjng a voluntary dismissal
The plaintiffs dismissed their cases after the two sides reached a settlement agreement.
without a settlement
No, with a settlement, as evidenced by the defendants all properly complying with the GPL.
often WITH PREJUDICE
There is no reason to use scare capitals. Dismissing with prejudice is a completely ordinary outcome of a settlement, and I have in the past posted many such examples. It is simply a prudent request from the defendants, so that the plaintiffs cannot later come back and reopen the case.
The plaintiffs have *never* received any damages
You cannot know this, since such settlement details are generally kept private. This is just something you wish was true. What we do know, since it is public, is that the defendants properly comply with the GPL. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
