Alexander Terekhov <[email protected]> writes: Hi!
>> Well, still the EPL FAQ [1] says, that you cannot combine GPL with >> EPL code in one module. > > Ha ha. Why can't you suggest and/or implement the solution of making > *two* modules, Tassilo? At least for some components we'll go in that direction. But in the case of our lib, that makes no sense. The overall project cannot work without it; it's the underlying repository and provides all of the data structures. Hm, citing the EPL FAQ: ,---- | Further, you may not combine EPL and GPL code in any scenario where | source code under those licenses are both the same source code module. `---- I have to admit, that I don't really understand that sentence. I can read it, that only mixing (in the sense of copy&paste) EPL code and GPL code in one file is forbidden. I can also read it, that I may not have a JAR-file containing GPL code bundled with an EPL project. Well, but the FSF's statement is clear: ,---- | Based upon the position of the Free Software Foundation, you may not | combine EPL and GPL code in any scenario where linking exists between | code made available under those licenses. The above applies to both | GPL version 2 and GPL version 3. `---- Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
