In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack <[email protected]> wrote: > Alan Mackenzie wrote: >> Rjack <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Have you posted, or tried to post, on Groklaw, RJack? > Why not ask your buddy PJ? She fanatically records and attempts to > analyze all network quads that communicate with the Groklaw site. Is that right? ;-) > I do occasionally communicate with interactive blog sites using both a > double blind commercial anonymizer and and old dial-up site that has > random dhcp assignment. Do you really? > It is quite entertaining to watch people endlessly speculate about the > identity of a poster while they are quite obviously incapable of > formulating a cogent response to the posted message. The identity of the poster is an essential part of the message. > If you have no information concerning the author of a message then you > have to criticize the content of the message and not the messenger, > which is the way it should be on a network with over one billion > participants. Rjack, I can't say I'm that interested in what you post on Groklaw. It's the notion of you posting there at all that tickles me. > Sincerely, > Rjack -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
