Alexander Terekhov <[email protected]> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: > [...] >> But I agree that it does not seem to be of much importance or >> precedence. Pretty little in connection with GPL court cases is, since > > How come that up-thread you've been suggesting that this supposedly > groundbreaking ruling "might change the GPL enforcement strategies at > least in France: this is already the appellate court IIRC, so it should > set a precendence" < LOL > silly GNUtian dak?
Because the first impression has been superceded by more information? That concept may be foreign to you, but it is not without precedence. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
