Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/15/black_duck_gpl_web_conference_copenhaver_radcliffe/ > > "GPLv2 - copyright code or contract? > > Open source legal minds unravel license > > By Austin Modine in San Francisco • Get more from this author > > Posted in Software, 15th October 2009 06:02 GMT > > Two prominent IP lawyers have warned that the all-pervasive General > Public License version 2 (GPLv2) contains legally ambiguous wording that > may be problematic for licensees.
Impossible. Peter Koehlmann told us here in COLA that is was "easy" and only "windiots" could not understand it. He is, of course, quite insane. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
