Tim Smith <[email protected]> writes: > The FSF says the GPL is for code.
...and other things. They use it for graphics: http://www.gnu.org/graphics/meditate.html And I think Richard has said the GPL is a fine licence for documentation. They also say: The GNU GPL can be used for general data which is not software, as long as one can determine what the definition of “source code” refers to in the particular case. >From here: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OtherLicenses And, as we all know, by "source code", they mean a "preferred form of the work for making modifications to it". The definition of "source code" for music is certainly unclear, but then I wonder what someone should do if they want to allow people to link their music into some software (such as a game). Maybe dual-licensing GPL plus cc-by-sa is the right thing to do? -- Ciarán O'Riordan, +32 487 64 17 54, http://ciaran.compsoc.com Please help build the software patents wiki: http://en.swpat.org http://www.EndSoftwarePatents.org Donate: http://endsoftwarepatents.org/donate List: http://campaigns.fsf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/esp-action-alert _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
