Alan Mackenzie <[email protected]> writes:

> In gnu.misc.discuss David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Most certainly the SFLC does not need to read the outpour of
>> self-proclaimed legal amateurs in this newsgroup in order to plan their
>> course of action.
>
> What makes you think Rjack is a legal amateur?

Wishful thinking.  I'd not wish anybody to suck as badly in the area of
his profession.

> I don't think he's ever made the matter of his profession clear in
> this mailing list.

So he is speaking and acting as an amateur here.  Whether or not he has
a second life does not really play into this.

-- 
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Reply via email to