Remember when Pee Jay aggressively attacked Alexander Terekhov over at her Groklaw blog?
"Also, I thought you'd find it interesting that an antiGPL activist, Alexander Terekhov, has for years been posting comments on the internet that the way to, in essence, steal GPL code is to use first sale and copyright misuse. Another example. Here's the beginning of a long thread on that topic, and you'll notice that his contributions also mention copyright misuse and how rms is allegedly trying to destroy 'freedom' with the GPL. He also claimed that Eben Moglen would never dare to go to court against Cisco/Linksys/Broadcom or whoever, because he'd lose since his GPL 'game' was all about bluff. That was in 2004. As you know, the Software Freedom Law Center has since gone to court successfully regarding the GPL multiple times, so be aware that his "legal" views are not accurate, in my view. Here's the Cisco/Linksys settlement in May, for example. But I've wondered if SCO saw all the comments from him and Daniel Wallace, a/k/a gumout, and actually believed it was worth trying some of their theories, thinking the FSF would be a pushover, and I wonder the same about Psystar's more subtle approach." http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2009081716312060 Pee Jay trumpeted, "the Software Freedom Law Center has since gone to court successfully regarding the GPL multiple times". This, despite Eben Moglen's SFLC voluntarily dismissing the seven suits before a federal judge could ever read a single word of any complaint. Now that the internet is buzzing with the fraudulent copyright claims of Erik Andersen, where pray tell, is Pee Jay's analysis of the situation? Who's stealing the code now, Pee Jay? As is typical of the blogs astro-turfing for Eben Moglen and the SFLC, Groklaw wallows in the golden sound of silence. Pee Jay had an apoplectic fit of moral outrage when SCO tried a scam on folks. Where's the moral outrage now Pee Jay? Alexander was 100% on target when he claimed, "[T]hat Eben Moglen would never dare to go to court against Cisco/Linksys/Broadcom or whoever, because he'd lose since his GPL 'game' was all about bluff". BLUFF and FRAUD. Pee Jay, that's what the GPL is all about. BLUFF and FRAUD. You can rest assured that the fourteen defendants' legal departments in the SFLC's current fraudulent action will want to depose Mr. Andersen concerning his copyright "ownership" of BusyBox v. 0.60.3. Let the games begin. The SFLC, frivolously and with the intent to harass and intimidate the defendants, filed seven consecutive federal lawsuits without the legal standing to do so. So... a fraudulent copyright registration was filed to remedy the standing issue. That's out of the frying pan and into the fire. A federal court is going to call the SFLC's bluff sooner or later. Let the games begin. Sincerely, Rjack _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
