In gnu.misc.discuss RJack <[email protected]> wrote: > Hyman Rosen wrote: >> On 1/11/2010 11:34 AM, RJack wrote: >>> UHHHH..... Doesn't look like Google embraced the GPL to me
"Embrace" is a silly word here. Firms don't wrap their arms round software to give it hugs. "Embrace" is one of these well-nigh meaningless words loved by market droids, one which sound really positive and friendly, yet can be used when the user is anxious to avoid being pinned down to any precise meaning. It looks like that's how you've used the word above. >> Android runs a Linux kernel. Linux is distributed under the GPL. >> Google could have chosen a non-GPLed kernel, as Apple did. But they >> did not. Google uses a variety of licenses. For example, Google >> Chromium is BSD-licensed >> <http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html>. > Android is NOT Linux, no matter how you spin it Hyman RJack, "is" isn't a helpful word, here. Android contains Linux, and includes other software too. You may be getting confused between Linux the kernel and the multitude of "Linux"es which, along with the kernel, include GNU system software and tools, BSD licensed networking stuff and MIT licensed X11. In that sense, Android "is" just as much a "Linux" as Red Hat, or SuSE, or Debian, or Gentoo, or ...... > Sincerely, > RJack :) -- Alan Mackenzie (Nurmberg, Germany). _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
