Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
> On 2/1/2010 1:27 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Hey Antonis, Hyman correctly noted (must have taken his meds in the
> > meantime) that the GPL {non-}system library nonsense element is
> > unenforceable.
>
> Unsurprisingly, you are misstating my claim. The library provisions
Your meds are way too short acting Hyman.
> > Note that the official GNU party line doesn't agree with
> > such outcome.
>
> That's correct. But they're wrong.
You can't have it both ways.
Either you agree that both the GPL's proper {non-}system library stuff
and the entire
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/lesser.html ("You may convey a covered work
under sections 3 and 4 of this License without being bound by section 3
of the GNU GPL") is meaningless hot air or you should stick to the
official GNU party line, silly.
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
