Hyman Rosen wrote: > > On 2/3/2010 4:34 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > Shut up or sue me > > I will do neither.
Why am I not surprised? > > > I don't understand your desire... > > Desire is irrelevant. Fact is relevant. I am pointing > out the facts of the situation. It is your desire to You are pointing nothing relevant and ignoring the facts: Facts such as http://www.redhat.com/licenses/rhel_us_3.html "LICENSE AGREEMENT AND LIMITED PRODUCT WARRANTY RED HAT® ENTERPRISE LINUX® AND RED HAT® APPLICATIONS This agreement governs the use of the Software and any updates to the Software, regardless of the delivery mechanism. The Software is a collective work under U.S. Copyright Law. " note that Red Hat's collective work contains tons of non-GPL components even "incompatible" with the GPL. regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
