Stop trolling Mackenzie. Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > >> Alexander Terekhov <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > I don't understand your desire to infect separate and independeant > >> > works via static linking and at the same time your desire to not > >> > penetrate the infection through the dynamic linking. > > >> "To penetrate the infection" ???? What the heck is that supposed to > >> mean? > > > http://www.umsha.ac.ir/jrhs/Upload/vol6num2/6-Vojdani%5B1%5D.pdf > > > "Those prostheses contaminated by microorganisms such as gram-negative > > Bacilli or Entrobacters could penetrate the infection into > > oropharyngeal area and increase the risk of pneumonia" > > > Got it now Alan? > > Yep. You were talking total garbage, and you've just googled the phrase > and found something utterly irrelevant. Aren't you clever?
I was talking about Hyman's position according to which the GPL infection penetrates (and infects other separate and independent works) through static linking and not penetrates through dynamic linking you silly. regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
