Take your meds, Hyman. Hyman Rosen wrote: > > On 2/10/2010 11:02 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > ownership of > > "computer source code" (aka a "computer program" work under 17 USC 101) > > has nothing to do with ownership "as compiler" as in 17 USC 101 > > 'compilation'. Nor has it anything to do with ownership of separate and > > independant works such "Pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works" under > > 17 USC 101 > > <http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane> > In addition to the copyright notices, McFarlane registered > copyright on the issues and the books. > ... McFarlanes registrations no more revealed an intent to claim > copyright in Gaimans contributions, as distinct from McFarlanes > own contributions as compiler and illustrator, . . . > > Your reading comprehension is as lacking as always. > Registration of copyright in a work is not a claim > against any co-authors who may exist. It is a formal > notice by an author that he has copyright in the work.
regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
