Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/10/2010 10:08 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
At some point, the New York bar will have no choice but to disbar
the entire gang of utterly incompetent GNU arch legal beagles from
SFLC for consistent filing of frivolous lawsuits such as
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2009/dec/14/busybox-gpl-lawsuit/
in which (1) "the Software Freedom Conservancy" is utterly
frivolous 'plaintiff' because it doesn't own ANY busybox copyrights
and (2) Erik Andersen is also utterly frivolous 'plaintiff' because
he was NOT joined by Bruce Perens and other contributors to the
joint work known as busybox at http://busybox.net/.
The SFLC has had successful outcomes in every single case that it has
filed - all defendants have come into compliance with the GPL. No
defendant has chosen to fight the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs chose to file automatic involuntary dismissals before any
judge could ever read their frivolous Complaints. Why why would a
plaintiff answer a Complaint that has been dismissed?
ROFL
"The Captain's scared them out of the water!"
http://www.fini.tv/blog/finishing_line_files/a44f9390355368f87dc47b7ec094f93e-36.php
ROFL. ROFL. ROFL.
Sincerely,
RJack
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
