chrisv http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/2007/09/chrisv-liar.html wrote: > > Hyman Rosen wrote: > > >On 2/10/2010 3:50 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > > >> The idea is that by doing a few modifying and copyrightable changes into > >> a "single program" in response to the GPL offer one becomes a joint > >> copyright owner of the entire work "as a whole" and can rightfully > >> license that entire work (with 'as a whole' as 'defined' and intended by > >> the GPL) in disrespect of the GPL. > > Good gravy, what a ludicrous claim. You are a fscking idiot.
"Fsck you arsehole troll." http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/2007/09/chrisv-liar.html regards, alexander. P.S. "It is just like a suit to enforce a copyright license, which arises under state law rather than under the Copyright Act. " Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane P.P.S. "the registered work is a compilation" Hyman's lovin' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
