On 2/17/2010 1:15 PM, RJack wrote:
The SFLC attorneys filed seven consecutive frivolous
infringement suits for Erik Andersen over BusyBox code when Andersen had
not filed *anything* -- nada, null, nil -- with the Copyright Office.
Filing seven consecutive suits without standing is frivolous and stupid.

When each of those lawsuits ended, the defendants came
into compliance with the GPL. Since the outcomes of the
suits were as the plaintiffs wanted, your characterization
of the suits hardly matters. Results count.

Not wanting to discuss the unpleasant topic of legal incompetency
reigning at the SFLC, you quickly change the topic of discussion.

I am judging the competency by the results. Once the
SFLC consistently fails to gain compliance with the
GPL, I'll be happy to revisit this topic.

The SFLC is run by a socialist crackpot who happily pimps gullible Free
Softies and collects a six figure salary from public donations.

The SFLC is gaining compliance with the GPL. People
are free to donate to whatever cause they like, and
some people like to donate to organizations that help
gain compliance with the GPL. Perhaps you should start
your own organization that helps defend people against
the SFLC. Then you too could collect donations.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Reply via email to