David Kastrup wrote: > > John Hasler <[email protected]> writes: > > > RJack writes: > >> Hyman will just ignore the Supreme Court decision as if it didn't > >> exist and continue to quote the Federal Circuit's erroneous finding. > > > > If the Federal Circuit's finding is in conflict with Supreme Court > > precedents why has it not been appealed thereto? > > This likely should be considered addressed comprehensively with the > "scared them out of the water. LOL LOL LOL" babble.
The appeal to CAFC was an interlocutory appeal (no final judgement) from an order regarding PI. For the purposes of granting or not granting PI, the CAFC error regarding confusion of conditions precedent v. scope restrictions v. covenants was made moot by later Winter v. NRDC decision of SCOTUS. Did you notice that judge White refused to grant the PI on remand as well? Correcting an utterly obvious error by a district judge from New Jersey sitting by designation on CAFC panel in a moot PI case would be quite a waste of SCOTUS time, don't you think so silly dak? regards, alexander. P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system so that I can do the builds." Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress." Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
