From the Erik Andersen vs. Best Buy et. al. Scheduling Order entered Feb. 22, 2010 appearing on PACER as case no. 1:09-cv-10155-SAS
"Shira A. Scheindlin U.S.D.J. ... 2. A concise statement of the issues as they then appear; Pending results of Defendants' investigations, Defendants intend to show that the Plaintiff's have no damages, that the Defendants did nothing actionable under copyright law, that any alleged copying was not willful, that Plaintiffs are not the proper parties, that the copyright held by Mr. Andersen is not applicable, and that, since being put on notice of the purported requirements of the general public license, Defendants have endeavored to come into compliance with what can only be described as a 'moving target'." Sincerely, RJack :) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
