Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 3/1/2010 7:45 AM, RJack wrote:
An unlicensed use of the copyright is not an infringement unless it
conflicts with one of the specific exclusive rights conferred by
the copyright statute.
The infringing use is copying and distribution, exactly as specified
in the copyright statute.
Sadly your apparent inability to understand the distinction between
the proposed "use" (scope restriction) and the enumerated exclusive
rights themselves leaves you appearing as ignorant as ever.
Neither copyright "attributions" nor "licensing" utilize the exclusive
rights in copyrighted source code and as a consequence of this fact, the
proposed uses cannot conflict with one of the specific exclusive rights
conferred by the copyright statute.
Both copyright attributions and copyright licenses are written in
plain English -- not model train source code. Your claims to the
contrary leave you looking utterly foolish. You should take more pride
in yourself.
"An unlicensed use of the copyright is not an infringement unless it
conflicts with one of the specific exclusive rights conferred by the
copyright statute. Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. Aiken, 422 U.S., at
154-155."; SONY CORP. OF AMER. v. UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS, INC., 464 U.S.
417 (1984).
Supreme Court vs. moron. Court wins.
ROFL
Sincerely,
RJack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
