Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes: > RJack wrote: > [...] >> b) They'll tell the court that the doctrine of promissory estoppel applies. > > That's Versa's tenth defense. > > "TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE > (ESTOPPEL) > > On information and belief, Defendant alleges that Plaintiffs’ claims are > barred by the doctrine of estoppel."
Yeah, that one is hilarious as well. "Dear court, how could we assume that we had license conditions to heed when making use of a license? They promised we could use their software under GPL, that certainly must be enough to stop them from asking us to heed it." We'll see how much of the defendants beliefs survives in court. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
