On 3/9/2010 10:00 AM, RJack wrote:
The case is filed in the Second Circuit.
> The CAFC has no precedental value anywhere in the
federal system.
The reasoning will apply universally, since it is correct.
At the end of the day, 'statutory damages should bear some relation to actual damages suffered'
But infringing defendants will be enjoined from continuing to infringe regardless of the monetary value of damage suffered by the plaintiffs. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
