On 3/22/2010 4:35 PM, RJack wrote:
No matter what you say or how many time you say it, BSD licensed code remains under the BSD license and not the GPL license.
Derivative works of BSD-licensed code may be otherwise licensed. Indeed, that's why anti-GPL cranks think it's a superior license.
Incorporate away DAK -- all you want -- still, BSD licensed code remains under the BSD license and not the GPL license.
The creator of a derivative work may license his work in any way he chooses, and the BSD license does not forbid that. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
