Hyman Rosen wrote: > > On 3/25/2010 12:33 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > Wow. Hyman, I agree with you 100% with the caveat that static > > linking doesn't change anything. It's mere aggregation > > Your agreement or disagreement is irrelevant, since even when > your conclusions are correct you seldom arrive at them through > correct reasoning. Your error with respect to static linking > is an example; a statically linked program is not a mere > aggregation of its components.
Sez who? regards, alexander. P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the originality standards required by copyright law." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
