On 3/25/2010 12:50 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Why do you think that "assembled" doesn't fall under "mere aggregation"? Why do you think that "collection and assembling" doesn't fall under "mere aggregation"?
Do you think that leaving out the portion of the law which shows you are wrong is convincing? <http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#101> in such a way that the resulting work as a whole constitutes an original work of authorship _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
